It would be great if the only thing to do could be to add such a
precision. This would encourage the incremental deployment of some
outbound draft features even if the registrar does not support
outbound.

Xavier



On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Christer Holmberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>
>  >>Again, that is what I have proposed as an alternative. I have said
>  >>that the UA should be allowed, when it sees the "ob"
>  >>parameter in the Path, to use keep-alive even if the registrar does
>  not
>  >>support outbound.
>  >
>  >What's there to stop it from doing just that?
>
>  Nothing, as far as I know.
>
>  I am only asking for some clarification text.
>
>  The draft currently says:
>
>  "The UAC examines successful registration responses for the presence
>  of an 'outbound' option-tag in a Require header field value.
>  Presence of this option-tag indicates that the registrar is compliant
>  with this specification, and that any edge proxies which needed to
>  participate are also compliant."
>
>  So, I think it would be good to add something like:
>
>  "If the registrar did not support outbound, but there was a path header
>  with the edge proxy URI
>  present in the 200 OK response to the REGISTER message, the UAC may
>  check
>  whether the URI-parametyer "ob" is included in the URI. If so, then the
>  UAC knows that
>  outbound keepalives can be used even though the registrar does not
>  support outbound."
>
>  So, it's just a clarification...
>
>  Regards,
>
>  Christer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
>  This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
>  Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
>  Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
>
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip

Reply via email to