Christer Holmberg writes: > The problem is that there are also cases where the ob proxies and > registrars ARE separated, and what you propose may not be needed in > such scenarios.
i know that and i hoped that outbound would make a simple, redundant implementation possible. it was very close, when it was accepted that at least two ob proxies must be used. now this multiple contact thing killed it. > Why don't you simply configure your UA to register each contact with > multiple ob/registrar proxies? the problem is that many UAs don't support that kind of configuration, because there has been no rfc that would mandate them to do so. i was hoping that ob would do it. > >also, reliability will necessarily suffer also in complex implementation > >when one of the contacts would not be available via more than one proxy. > > If both contacts are "equal" I don't think that will be a > problem. There will be two ways to reach the UA, as if a single > contact was used. they are NOT equal and you cannot assume it. for example, gprs connectivity might be much more reliable than wlan connectivity or vice versa. but this is all theory anyhow, because ob draft is badly broken, because it does not support forking at all and thus is in grave conflict with rfc3261. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
