Dean Willis writes: > Why do I get the feeling that you won't be happy even when every UA is > forced to register every contact it has or might obtain have with > every registrar that ever existed or will exist ;-)?
dean, that is not true. i sincerely hoped that outbound would help me to implement redundant proxy/registrar without a need to for load balancers, database clusters, or forwarding of requests between proxies simply by being able to assume that if i have two ob proxies, each ua would register all contacts that it has via both of them. this is a VERY simple, easy to understand and implement requirement compared to anything else this working group has ever produced. -- juha > > On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > > Dean Willis writes: > > > >> Assume a UA has two different interfaces, and it registers each of > >> its > >> interfaces with a different proxy/registrar. Further assume that > >> those > >> two proxy registrars collude with respect to mapping the user's AUR > >> onto those contacts. > > > > that "collude" thing is exactly what i tried to avoid. if ua is > > required to register all of its contacts via both proxies, then > > redundancy of the service can be implemented by running the > > two proxy/registrars completely independent of each other thus greatly > > simplifying the implementation. > > > > if that requirement is not there, ob becomes totally useless again and > > there was no advantage that the text was changed according to my > > wishes. you may as well go and change it back to what it was before. > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
