Why do I get the feeling that you won't be happy even when every UA is
forced to register every contact it has or might obtain have with
every registrar that ever existed or will exist ;-)?
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Dean Willis writes:
Assume a UA has two different interfaces, and it registers each of
its
interfaces with a different proxy/registrar. Further assume that
those
two proxy registrars collude with respect to mapping the user's AUR
onto those contacts.
that "collude" thing is exactly what i tried to avoid. if ua is
required to register all of its contacts via both proxies, then
redundancy of the service can be implemented by running the
two proxy/registrars completely independent of each other thus greatly
simplifying the implementation.
if that requirement is not there, ob becomes totally useless again and
there was no advantage that the text was changed according to my
wishes. you may as well go and change it back to what it was before.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
