Dean Willis writes: > Assume a UA has two different interfaces, and it registers each of its > interfaces with a different proxy/registrar. Further assume that those > two proxy registrars collude with respect to mapping the user's AUR > onto those contacts.
that "collude" thing is exactly what i tried to avoid. if ua is required to register all of its contacts via both proxies, then redundancy of the service can be implemented by running the two proxy/registrars completely independent of each other thus greatly simplifying the implementation. if that requirement is not there, ob becomes totally useless again and there was no advantage that the text was changed according to my wishes. you may as well go and change it back to what it was before. > What's not redundant about this, and why is it useless? see above. if we assume that ob set share common knowledge of the registrations (e.g. via database), then registering via only some of the ob proxies works fine. -- juha _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
