Juha Heinanen wrote:
Paul Kyzivat writes:
> Then, what causes the UA to register two different contacts? Are the
> wlan contact and the 3g contact registered to *different* AORs? If not I
> don't see the point. If anything, I would expect that 3g and wlan
> represent access networks and hence differing proxies, not AORs or
> registrars.
my sip uri is sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the nokia phone on my desk is
currently registered to proxy of tutpro.com domain via both its wlan
interface and its 3g interface. there is no need to have two different
proxies.
That's a sensible arrangement. I suppose the wlan and 3g interfaces have
different IP addresses, and so you have a separate contact for each? So
you register two contacts to the same AOR via the same proxy, right?
by the way, when my phone is on wlan and gprs network, the methods
supported by wlan contact and gprs contact are not the same (if that
matters anything to the instance-id business).
In that case the choice of one instance id or two is a value judgment on
your part. I would expect the default choice would be that they would
have the same instance id. You might prefer distinct instance IDs if you
want them considered independent devices. For instance, if one is
IM-only and the other is voice-only then you might want them treated
independently. But if they have overlapping capabilities, then you may
have to then suffer having them both "ring" for the same call, which
could be annoying. (But you might be able to program them to hide that.)
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
