On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:58 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > What is the naming convention for proprietary headers, parameters, etc.? > I though we were starting them with "X-sipX-", but some recent creations > start "sipXecs-"? Using an "X-" prefix would be more conformant to > Internet conventions, but in any case, we should make them all > consistent. (And since they are all set by #defines, it is easy enough > to revise them.)
Actually, the 'X-' prefix convention was recently explicitly dropped. Since 'sipXecs' is a trademark, I think that using it is quite sufficient to ensure uniqueness, and that we should use that. That having been said, it's also kind of verbose, so in my pending checkin shortening some generated values (not headers or parameters), I replaced '-sipXecs-' with '-XX-': just as recognizable, but 5 characters shorter. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
