On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:31 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > Actually, the 'X-' prefix convention was recently explicitly dropped.
I must have missed it. Who was it that did what? > Since 'sipXecs' is a trademark, I think that using it is quite > sufficient to ensure uniqueness, and that we should use that. > > That having been said, it's also kind of verbose, so in my pending > checkin shortening some generated values (not headers or parameters), I > replaced '-sipXecs-' with '-XX-': just as recognizable, but 5 characters > shorter. The branch value, I assume. Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
