On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:03 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:31 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > > Actually, the 'X-' prefix convention was recently explicitly dropped. > > I must have missed it. Who was it that did what?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis-02.txt Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 4. Extensibility and Architecture [...] Instead, the registration of SIP headers in Informational IETF specifications, or in documents outside the IETF, is now permitted under the Designated Expert (per RFC5226) criteria. The future use of any header field name prefix ("P-" or "X-" or what have you) to designate SIP headers of limited applicability is discouraged. > > Since 'sipXecs' is a trademark, I think that using it is quite > > sufficient to ensure uniqueness, and that we should use that. > > > > That having been said, it's also kind of verbose, so in my pending > > checkin shortening some generated values (not headers or parameters), I > > replaced '-sipXecs-' with '-XX-': just as recognizable, but 5 characters > > shorter. > > The branch value, I assume. Right. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
