On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:31 -0400, Scott Lawrence wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:58 -0400, Dale Worley wrote: > > What is the naming convention for proprietary headers, parameters, etc.? > > I though we were starting them with "X-sipX-", but some recent creations > > start "sipXecs-"? Using an "X-" prefix would be more conformant to > > Internet conventions, but in any case, we should make them all > > consistent. (And since they are all set by #defines, it is easy enough > > to revise them.) > > Actually, the 'X-' prefix convention was recently explicitly dropped. > > Since 'sipXecs' is a trademark, I think that using it is quite > sufficient to ensure uniqueness, and that we should use that.
We should adjust all the other X-sipX-* headers, etc. to match, shouldn't we? Dale _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
