Paul Mossman wrote: > > Scott wrote: ... >> 4. I added annotations to the Enabled column (could be somewhere else >> or a column by itself) whenever an earlier rule masks (matches) all >> or part of the same pattern: >> >> ⇑ when some numbers matched by this rule would be matched by an >> earlier rule ∅ when all numbers matched by this rule would be matched >> by an earlier rule (making this rule a no-op) > > Nice. > > This would often depend on whether or not the schedule for earlier rules > is in effect.
Actually it would not. This is unfortunately not how the schedules work at the moment. Once the pattern matches rules is executed or not. But even if schedule is off proxy will not attempt to match another rule. I think there is an issue for that. > > Is there any way to factor that into the annotations? > > The challenging aspect is that schedule periods can overlap with each > other. So it would not be as simple as having a single "Active > Schedule" selection. You'd need to account for multiple schedules being > active. (The "Always" schedule is of course always active.) > > One option would be to base the annotations on a single point in time, > which defaults to "now". The user could then select some other point in > time, which may change the annotations. It would be nice if you were > also shown which schedules are active at the selected point in time. > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
