On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:10 -0500, Paul Mossman wrote: > Scott wrote: > ... > > 4. I added annotations to the Enabled column (could be somewhere else > > or a column by itself) whenever an earlier rule masks (matches) all or part > > of the same pattern: > > > > ⇑ when some numbers matched by this rule would be matched by an earlier > > rule > > ∅ when all numbers matched by this rule would be matched by an earlier > > rule > > (making this rule a no-op) > > Nice. > > This would often depend on whether or not the schedule for earlier > rules is in effect. > > Is there any way to factor that into the annotations? > > The challenging aspect is that schedule periods can overlap with each > other. So it would not be as simple as having a single "Active > Schedule" selection. You'd need to account for multiple schedules > being active. (The "Always" schedule is of course always active.)
Actually, I think that the challenging part is going to be figuring out if the patterns overlap at all, regardless of the schedule, but your suggestion is a good one anyway when we get to that point. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
