Ranga wrote: ... > > We will use these two Gateway fields: > > > > 1. "Address" on the Gateway - Configuration (main) screen: > > itsp-proxy-domain > > > > 2. "ITSP server address" on the Gateway - ITSP Account > screen (under > > advanced): itsp-proxy-address > > > > The "Address" is already required, since it cannot be blank. > > > The ITSP server address can be left blank. Usually only the > ITSP proxy domain is needed.
Yup, that's how the UI works today. The itsp-proxy-domain cannot be blank, but the itsp-proxy-address can. > As far as I know what you have today in 4.0.4 is the same as > what you are describing above. What is the change ( or have I > missed something) ? Note sure about 4.0.4... But currently in 4.2 the generated forwardingrules.xml and sipxbridge.xml never have the configured itsp-proxy-address and/or itsp-proxy-domain values! Instead, they always have the values from the ITSP template. The values stored in the DB are ignored! Probably this wasn't noticed because nobody ever found the need to over-ride the defaults from an ITSP template. Luckily the CS1K "ITSP" template doesn't have defaults for these, hence the error described in XX-7695 occurred. The XX-7695 root problem is not CS1K specific. To see what I mean, create a SIP Trunk using the ATT template. Be sure to replace the default "please.contact.att" itsp-proxy-domain with something plausible. Then check the generated forwardingrules.xml and sipxbridge.xml. Both will contain "please.contact.att", because that's what's in the template! Bogdan's XX-7695 patch will fix this problem. -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
