that's great... I'm ready to contribute but I need to discuss if all community is agree with my ideas
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Michael Picher <[email protected]> wrote: > eZuce isn't putting any dev effort into the existing acd platform. > > Contributions are of course welcome. > > Mike > > On May 9, 2012 4:17 AM, "Domenico Chierico" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Working on old style ACD I've found some some strange behaviours for >> which I'm trying to get a fix. >> I'm not sure if all are interested into ACD improvement so I'm >> reporting it just to know what to do. >> >> at first some odds on configuration: >> >> if I haven't set any Overflow strategies the maxWaitTime counter is >> forced to 0, I feel that this is an unnecessary constraint, so i >> removed this and lets the calls into queue get a "call termination" >> stuff. >> >> quite the same is for the maxQueueDepth strategies that works just if >> some overflow strategie is set. >> >> Then I've some other little improvements that I can discuss with you >> later. >> >> >> Domenico Chierico >> _______________________________________________ >> sipx-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
