Just my luck... Good luck I guess. I bought the audicodes device, and 
now I got the SPA3102 to work. Not sure what I changed that was so 
significant, but something did it.

On 2/18/2010 12:03 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Thanks. I got an MP 118 working with no problems, and the 114 looks 
> about the same. I never really touched any of the settings on the 
> Audiocodes interface, so I guess I may keep it that way. I'll keep 
> playing with the SPA3102, but I probably should get something a little 
> more standard and known since I'll be supporting it remotely. Setting 
> factory defaults on the SPA though a handset and an voice menu was a 
> first for me!
>
> On that note, does anyone have the 5.4 firmware for am MP 114? I know, 
> it is horrible practice that you can't get it from their site. I just 
> know I can get their devices working, and that is what I'm going with 
> at the moment.
>
>
>
> On 2/18/2010 11:55 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>> I started with an Audiocodes gateway back in October, it was the one 
>> model (FXO+FXS) that sipxecs wouldn't configure and the sipxecs 
>> configuration stuff for FXO required it to be treated as a homogenous 
>> group of ports. Two things led me to return it:
>>
>>     1) The documentation and manual configuration of the SPA3102 is 
>> pretty good compared to Audiocodes  (there were numerous occasions 
>> when changing what appeared to be a completely unrelated setting 
>> resulted in no dialtone on the FXS side, I think they just internally 
>> bail if anything is amiss and give you no diagnostics).
>>     2) On a brand new unit they wanted me to buy a service contract 
>> to get the current firmware and download the manuals (such as they are)
>>
>> The SPA may be a buggy POS but Audiocodes was at least as frustrating 
>> to configure and, as a bonus, it was expensive too.
>>
>> I expect someone using a model supported by sipXecs for configuration 
>> would have a better experience.
>>
>> I feel your pain, the SPA sure is a PITA to get going. Happy to help 
>> if I can, all those hours spent beating my head on the damn thing 
>> might as well go to some good :)
>>
>> -Eric Varsanyi
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> This ebay auction is starting to look tempting :)
>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350265531020&rvr_id=&crlp=1_263602_263622&UA=%3F*I7&GUID=d74220781250a0e203017dc1fbe784da&itemid=350265531020&ff4=263602_263622
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>> Audio Codes MP-114 FXO VOIP Gateway - NEW
>>> US $249.99
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/18/2010 11:17 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>>>> For debugging if you set it up to send syslog messages and turn the 
>>>> level all the way up it sometimes produces semi-useful output. You 
>>>> don't have to have a syslog server set up to catch it if you can 
>>>> run tcpdump or socat.
>>>>
>>>> If you can capture traffic to/from the device with tcpdump that's 
>>>> probably the next step if the syslog stuff doesn't pay off (it kind 
>>>> of sounds like either its ignoring you or sipxproxy isn't really 
>>>> sending the invite where you hope its going).
>>>>
>>>> -Eric Varsanyi
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I have no doubt it is a PEBKAC, I just don't where to look. I 
>>>>> changed it to 5061 (I now see that setting in the PSTN Line tab on 
>>>>> the spa3102). The logs look about the same to me. I don't see 
>>>>> anything that even tells me it is making it to the spa3102.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/18/2010 10:54 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When I set mine up late last year the only issue I had making 
>>>>>> outbound calls (that wasn't PEBKAC) was the thing didn't think 
>>>>>> there was a line attached and returned something like 'resource 
>>>>>> not avaiable' to the invite. I had to change the line voltage 
>>>>>> threshold down in the international settings box to fix this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, in the log I see you're using 5060, the FXO side by default 
>>>>>> is on 5061 (the FXS is on 5060). LIkely that's your issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Eric
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm trying to configure a spa3102 for outbound calls only. I 
>>>>>>> know people pull their hair out over these devices, but I wanted 
>>>>>>> to give it a shot. My only gateways I've worked with so far are 
>>>>>>> sipxbridge and an audiocodes configred from within sipx, so I 
>>>>>>> haven't really done too much manual FXO configuration.
>>>>>>> I think I may be missing something on the sipx end, because I 
>>>>>>> don't think the call is ever making it to the spa3102. This is a 
>>>>>>> new setup and has no other gateways. I added the spa3102 as an 
>>>>>>> unmanaged gateway. I enabled all the dialing plans and added the 
>>>>>>> gateway. I'm using a polycom 550, Sipx 4.0.4,  bootrom 4.2.1, 
>>>>>>> firmware 3.1.3C split. I would show a siptrace, but the merged 
>>>>>>> file doesn't really have anything in it. The sipx server is at 
>>>>>>> 10.81.1.5. The spa3102 is at 10.81.1.6. I tried setting the 
>>>>>>> gateway in sipx to UDP manually (that is what the spa3102 
>>>>>>> defaults to) and specifying port 5060, but that didn't seem to 
>>>>>>> change anything. There are only 2 logs created, so I attached 
>>>>>>> those. Is there something simple I'm missing? I read through 
>>>>>>> this, 
>>>>>>> http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_sipX_to_work_with_FXO/FXS_SIP_Gateways
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> but I don't see anything that sticks out at me. The only thig I 
>>>>>>> thought I might need to do is something in authrules.xml, but 
>>>>>>> I'm still not sure since the text around it refers to FXS and 
>>>>>>> this is FXO. I sort of guess there has to be some some sort of 
>>>>>>> authorization for the spa3102 to know the sipx call can be sent 
>>>>>>> outbound, but I don't know where to do this. Sorry if I'm 
>>>>>>> missing something obvious here. I think the fact that I got an 
>>>>>>> audiocodes 8 port working inbound and outbound with no questions 
>>>>>>> (and clearly not much knowledge on the subject) is a testament 
>>>>>>> to how well sipx is able to configure it!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>> <sipregistrar.log><sipXproxy.log>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>>>>>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> <sipregistrar.log><sipXproxy.log>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to