>>> On 1/26/2011 at 10:44 AM, in message 
>>> <[email protected]>, Tony Graziano 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>I'd like to hear his approach.
>>
>>In 4.4 freeswitch is not exactly sipx dependent and can be
>>upgraded/maintained separately from sipx if desired.
>>
>>On 4.2.1 its a different story.

The dependancy in 4.2.1 is purely in the rpm's.  Freeswitch in 4.2.1 is not 
modified for sipx specifically.   Though the name is changed to sipx-freeswitch 
and is referenced as a dependancy. 

We use a custom sipx build (SuSe)  for all our installs and we have always used 
the current freeswitch builds. 

So you can build freeswitch from source and just make sure target directories 
match what sipx expects.  You can get this from the source rpm spec file in the 
sipx-freeswitch rpm.

Of course, you completely break upgrades as yum will still expect the 
dependancy of sipx-freeswitch.  And any upgrade would conflict/overwrite any 
freeswitch built from source.

Or you can always compile sipx 4.2.1 from the srpms and simply drop in the 
latest freeswitch srpms but use the older spec file which still uses the 
sipx-freeswitch name.

There is a current opensuse build project that has the centos 4.2.1 rpms.  A 
simple clone of the project and you can pop in the new freeswitch srpms. 

-m

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to