I generally have never had an issue with inbound calls with them but if you're having an issue with toronto just move your did presents to another city and register there. On Sep 16, 2011 10:18 AM, "Tim Byng" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Tony Graziano < [email protected] >> wrote: > >> there are too many issues to count. kansas sample they do not support a >> hairpinned call. >> >> why is it that you think you have limited options? >> > We're currently with voip.ms, but we've had far too many issues. I just > wrote a description of a couple of the many problems we've experienced, but > I thought it came off as a rant, so I've decided not to post it here (it's > also a bit off topic). Just know that I've spent countless hours on issues > and many of the times it's a confirmed issue on the voip.ms side. > > So I've been told by my boss (and I agree) that we can't use > voip.msanymore, at least for inbound (outbound has been pretty > reliable for a while > now - inbound is the main issue). We're in Toronto and need to keep our > number. Are options are 1) we move our number to a company that will port > Toronto numbers (very limited choices), 2) we port our number back to a > landline service and forward it to a place where we can get Toronto DIDs > that don't port (still limited, but it opens the doors for a few more places > such as callwithus.com), or 3) we go back to multiple landlines and use voip > for outbound only. > > CallCentric is one of a few places that can port Toronto DIDs, but it > appears that they're not an option with sipXecs (and I don't want to move > away from sipXecs, as it's been rock solid). I'm open for suggestions on > high quality ITSPs that offer Toronto DIDs.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
