On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Tony Graziano <[email protected] > wrote:
> there are too many issues to count. kansas sample they do not support a > hairpinned call. > > why is it that you think you have limited options? > We're currently with voip.ms, but we've had far too many issues. I just wrote a description of a couple of the many problems we've experienced, but I thought it came off as a rant, so I've decided not to post it here (it's also a bit off topic). Just know that I've spent countless hours on issues and many of the times it's a confirmed issue on the voip.ms side. So I've been told by my boss (and I agree) that we can't use voip.msanymore, at least for inbound (outbound has been pretty reliable for a while now - inbound is the main issue). We're in Toronto and need to keep our number. Are options are 1) we move our number to a company that will port Toronto numbers (very limited choices), 2) we port our number back to a landline service and forward it to a place where we can get Toronto DIDs that don't port (still limited, but it opens the doors for a few more places such as callwithus.com), or 3) we go back to multiple landlines and use voip for outbound only. CallCentric is one of a few places that can port Toronto DIDs, but it appears that they're not an option with sipXecs (and I don't want to move away from sipXecs, as it's been rock solid). I'm open for suggestions on high quality ITSPs that offer Toronto DIDs.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
