They are an option if you want to get an Ingate... On Sep 16, 2011 10:18 AM, "Tim Byng" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Tony Graziano < [email protected] >> wrote: > >> there are too many issues to count. kansas sample they do not support a >> hairpinned call. >> >> why is it that you think you have limited options? >> > We're currently with voip.ms, but we've had far too many issues. I just > wrote a description of a couple of the many problems we've experienced, but > I thought it came off as a rant, so I've decided not to post it here (it's > also a bit off topic). Just know that I've spent countless hours on issues > and many of the times it's a confirmed issue on the voip.ms side. > > So I've been told by my boss (and I agree) that we can't use > voip.msanymore, at least for inbound (outbound has been pretty > reliable for a while > now - inbound is the main issue). We're in Toronto and need to keep our > number. Are options are 1) we move our number to a company that will port > Toronto numbers (very limited choices), 2) we port our number back to a > landline service and forward it to a place where we can get Toronto DIDs > that don't port (still limited, but it opens the doors for a few more places > such as callwithus.com), or 3) we go back to multiple landlines and use voip > for outbound only. > > CallCentric is one of a few places that can port Toronto DIDs, but it > appears that they're not an option with sipXecs (and I don't want to move > away from sipXecs, as it's been rock solid). I'm open for suggestions on > high quality ITSPs that offer Toronto DIDs.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
