On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +0000, Laurent Bercot wrote: > > Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6 > > the Debian policy-obeying way? > > What does that mean? If it's just FHS, skarnet.org follows FHS by > default, so there's no problem here. Are there other constraints > restricting what a Debian package can do? It's technically a pile of things: libs/skalibs (the .so) lib-devel/skalivs-dev (the .a for compiling against lang/execline lib/libexecline (the .so) lib-devel/libexecline-dev (the .a again) and so on. I have sort-of complaint packages that I used to get my build chain working for a project at work, but correctly separating stuff is a chunk of work. Doable, just obnoxious. > > -- > Laurent >
-- Colin Booth