Hi all,
thanks to Jim and Doug for the wonderful workthey do.  But I wonder, why did 
Skype have to change something that everyone was used to and happy about.  I 
think a lot of users, sighted or not, are going to be unhappy about this 
change.  Why not propose a choice between a" classic" or" modern" interface ?
furthermore, this new version of Skype doesn't seem to bring any interesting 
features other than the redesigned interface am I wrong?
Cheers,
JPR
http://myspace.com/jeanphilipperykiel

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: jim grimsby Jr. 
  To: 'a list for discussing skype and its use with screen access software.' 
  Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 5:36 AM
  Subject: Re: [Skypeenglish] scripts for beta 4



  Hi Doug the only reason I think the name of the tools menu  should be change
  is the name of options describes more of what this menu is.  
  For example this is where you set your skype setting pick your langwige etc.
  also the reason for removing dooplakits in the options dialog is simply to
  avoid confewtion. It is like ok I see video twice.  So now the first time I
  see it I have to tab threw to see if there is anything new here.  I see this
  in the options dialog now I see it on the menu does this option on the menu
  do something that the one in the dialog does not do so  now I have to check.
  Having the same options all over the place is just not user friendly.  Give
  me one place to do what I need to do and if possible give me a meaningful
  short cut and hot key to do it.
  Also you will now note that pressing enter now starts an im with the contact
  you are on in the contact list.  
  I would say that pressing inter should call the contact and control enter
  should start an im.  

  -----Original Message-----
  From: skypeenglish-bounces at emissives.com
  [mailto:skypeenglish-bounces at emissives.com] On Behalf Of Doug Lee
  Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 8:01 PM
  To: a list for discussing skype and its use with screen access software.
  Subject: Re: [Skypeenglish] scripts for beta 4

  Pardon my replying in mid-post format instead of top-posting like we
  normally do on lists populated primarily by blind people.  I'm
  forwarding this entire message to a Skype guy who's currently sitting
  across a table from me in a Hilton hotel bar. <grin>

  On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 07:03:10PM -0700, jim grimsby Jr. wrote:
  > I would first like to start out by commending doug  for excellent work on
  > the new scripts.  You are simply amazing getting a beta version of the
  > scripts out  only three days after the initial release of Beta one is
  quite
  > impressive.

  They were actually out on the same day as the beta release, but I'm
  afraid that wasn't as amazing as you might think.  I started work on
  these weeks ago. <smile>

  > That being said I would like to say a few things about the Skype beta
  > itself.
  > I will try to keep most of my comments on accessibility concerns since
  that
  > is the purpose of this list.
  > Skype has switched from a multiple window system and multiple tab system
  to
  > a multiple pain  system.
  > This being said, the standard keyboard command for switching between panes
  > is F6 to move forward by pain  and shipped  F6 to move backward by pain.
  > They should implement jumping to pains with control and  the number keys.
  > With all of the available panes appearing  in the view menu.

  There are only two panes.  The left pane is where the Contact list or
  the Conversation list appear, whichever you choose.  Skype natively
  lets you type Alt+1 or Alt+2 to show and focus Contacts or
  Conversations in that pane, respectively.  I changed those to Ctrl+1
  and Ctrl+2 to keep from conflicting with the normal Alt+numbers for
  reading chat messages, and I am encouraging Skype to make that change
  internally.  The View menu also has options to switch between Contacts
  and Conversations, but again, those are two lists in the left pane,
  only one of which shows up at a time.  My recommendation, based on
  yours and on what's already being done, is that F6 and Shift+F6 be
  implemented because they are standard pane-switching commands, but
  that Ctrl+numbers *not* be assigned to jumping to specific panes, as
  they have better uses.

  If more than two panes can exist in Skype 4, I don't know it but that
  might change my recommendations a bit.

  > The context menu shortcuts should be changed to mean something useful.
  For
  > example, when in the  context pane and you right click on a  contact  all
  of
  > the items for sends spell out the word  send.  Sorry    this is not
  > intuitive.  If I want to send an instant message, the intuitive  shortcut
  > would be i.  if I want to send a person a file the intuitive shortcut
  would
  > be f, and so on.
  > We have the same problem in the menu bar with three items starting with
  the
  > letter C. all of them having the shortcut of  c.
  > Let the shortcut for Paul be the letter a.  Let the shortcut for
  > conversation be the letter C. and let the shortcut for contacts be the
  > letter o.  

  Agreed:  (1) each shortcut must be unique to make them useful, and (2)
  they should be assigned mnemonically, not aesthetically.  Standard
  shortcut assignment rules are to pick the first available letter for
  each option, but this was causing problems of consistency before, like
  Alt+O for Options changing to Alt+P when an item was added above
  Options in the Tools menu, and View Profile in Context menus being V
  in some and W in others.  I therefore propose that a mnemonic
  assignment, once assigned, not change as new menu items are
  added--particularly when the already-assigned item is frequently used.

  > Put the change your mood  text  back in the profile menu.  After all, you
  > have add video to my mood.  So why not a change your  mood text menu item?

  Agreed.

  > Remove duplicates
  >  For example in the options dialog there are two places to configure sound
  > and video.  They do the same thing one place for this configuration is
  > enough.
  > Another thing is there is an option to set privacy  in the skype menu this
  > can already be done within the options dialog so having this menu option
  is
  > pointless. I am sure you get the idea. 

  I don't care one way or the other on this, but I suspect
  business/marketing forces drive where menu items appear sometimes.  I
  would consider this a low-priority issue.

  > In the skype menu you have the option called presence.    Short cut again
  is
  > p.
  > And then you have the option called profile,  and guess what the short cut
  > is p.  change presence back to change status. Short cut of s put sign out
  in
  > that sub menu where it belongs. 
  > Put change pass word in the profile section where it belong.  Remove the
  buy
  > credit  menu option  it is a link in the account section and there for not
  > needed in the skype menu.
  > Put share skype with a friend in the contacts section.  After all you are
  > sharing it with him in Oder to contact him right?

  A lot of ideas there, but again, I think we're up against business
  decisions, and I would not urge high priority on these items.

  > Rename the tools menu to options.  
  > Rename the options dialog to preferences.

  I do not think this is a good idea because the existing names have
  been around for a long time and people are used to them.

  > More exselorator keys.
  > Like create new contact control+n.
  > Preferences control+p.  etc.  
  > Or as I said in the past the ability to set global hot keys and local
  ones.
  > With defaults set and  turned on.  

  The extra accelerators would be helpful, yes.  To explain local vs.
  global hotkeys for the benefit of those who never saw that discussion:
  "Global hotkeys" are what we have now.  "Local hotkeys" would only
  work when a Skype window is in focus.  I thought this would be too
  confusing for most users, but I'm forwarding the idea for others to
  ponder.

  > Doug take these ideas and forward what you think will be helpful and
  discard
  > the rest as usual.  

  Doing so directly.  I will not often do things quite like this, but
  since I am actually out here with Skype developers in person, it seems
  to make sense this weekend. :-)  Btw, pardon any typos, I'm typing
  this over the top of some fairly loud music and conversation.

  -- 
  Doug Lee                 dgl at dlee.org        
  SSB BART Group           doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com
  http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
  "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them
  to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum

  Thanks for posting to the skype english list. To  access scripts for the
  latest version of skype go to 
  http://www.dlee.org/skype
  To access tutorials and other goodies go to
  http://www.marrie.org/skype/skype.html
  thanks and have a wonderful day.


  _______________________________________________
  Skypeenglish mailing list
  Skypeenglish at emissives.com
  http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/skypeenglish_emissives.com


  Thanks for posting to the skype english list. To  access scripts for the 
latest version of skype go to 
  http://www.dlee.org/skype
  To access tutorials and other goodies go to
  http://www.marrie.org/skype/skype.html
  thanks and have a wonderful day.


  _______________________________________________
  Skypeenglish mailing list
  Skypeenglish at emissives.com
  http://emissives.com/mailman/listinfo/skypeenglish_emissives.com

Reply via email to