Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nothing will be dropped completely :) Just talking about moving it to > a place that indicates the stuff is not functional and/or will not be > maintained any more. I still think we should do this with the JDBC > stores and also j2ee store in slidestore in order not to confuse > people about what DB store to use and what works ok.
Okay. > >>What about MemoryStore? What is it good for in the first place? > > Not that useful. But you could use it for example for the Lock store. > > > Also nice for testing. But not essential. > > So, ok. I'd propose to keep it then. I suppose it works correctly? No. :-(. Transactions are not working. So better drop it. Not worth fixing. > 1. I have no idea why some unique constraints are commented out :( > 2. URI_STRING in URI should be UNIQUE. Agreed! Still, if you have a > reasonable isolation level - say repeatable read, assureUriId > guarantees uniqueness. I see. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
