Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin Holz wrote: > > >>- Postgres port: Martin, I guess you have already done work on it, > >>right? Will it be ready for the first beta? > > Yes, unless I discover new bugs. But the content store will probably > > > not be real production quality. Not a slide problem, but a problem > > of the JDBC driver when handling large binary data. > > What do we do then? Omit it from the 2.0 release? I thought there was > a version that worked ok, wasn't there? It should be part of slide 2.0. If the postgres people do no apply my patch in time I could write at a workaround to the PostgresAdapter. Memory consumption for large documents (> 1 MB) will still be a problem. I was to optimistic here.
Btw is it acceptable to call connection.setAutocommit(false) in J2EE store? Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
