Oliver Zeigermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin Holz wrote:
- Postgres port: Martin, I guess you have already done work on it, right? Will it be ready for the first beta?
Yes, unless I discover new bugs. But the content store will probably
not be real production quality. Not a slide problem, but a problem of the JDBC driver when handling large binary data.
What do we do then? Omit it from the 2.0 release? I thought there was a version that worked ok, wasn't there?
It should be part of slide 2.0. If the postgres people do no apply my patch in time I could write at a workaround to the PostgresAdapter. Memory consumption for large documents (> 1 MB) will still be a problem. I was to optimistic here.
Ok, fine! Have got anything, yet? If so, why not check it in to the proposals section?
Btw is it acceptable to call connection.setAutocommit(false) in J2EE store?
No, I do not think so, but this is not done, is it?
Oliver
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
