> Martin Dulisch wrote: > > > > > > > >>From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>>>5.) Client > >>> > >>> > >>>yep, client has nothing to do with server and should have > >> > >>its own distro > >> > >>>and release cycles, IMO. > >>> > >>> > >>>>How would a client release look like? Who would take care > >> > >>of creating > >> > >>>>one (as I have no idea about it)? > >>> > >>> > >>>the client is mostly a library. README, javadocs, license, jar and > >>>source would do it for me... if somebody wants more, we'll welcome > >>>patches ;-) > >> > >>OK. > >> > > > > > > Do we need the 'package*' and 'release' targets in the client build script > > too? If yes I could add them. > > Hmmm. We either have to do the release by hand or we need a target. If > you have time it would be nice if you could add one...
Well, a release target seems like overkill to me, but if someone really wants to do it... > > By the way, do we need a binary Client release or only this full one? > > Oliver Are there not three options, binary only, full and source only? Some people might not bother about the sources at all, so a binary release might make sense. Regarding the other two options, I really have no preference. Ingo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
