We haven't discussed this yet.
Currently we are preparing a release. If we have finished this, it might be a good point. This will be at the start of the next year I think.
I recently made some experiences with svn so I can offer to do this.
Proposal for repository layout:
/jakarta
/slide
/server
/branches
/tags
/trunk
/src (content of current jararta-slide/src)
/docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs)
/lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib)
/client
/braches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient)
/ant
/clientlib
/commandline
/connector
/etc
/lib
/wck
/braches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck)
/conf
/src
/projector
/braches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector)
/lib
/src
...
/proposals (may be sandbox)
/braches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals)
...
/testsuite
/braches
/tags
/trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite)
/bin
...This is a separate repository for each component that may be released indepently.
Its just a proposal (:-)
Stefan
Henri Yandell wrote:
It seems to me that it would be good to get Slide over to Subversion before any moves to becoming a TLP.
Have you guys thought about your SVN migration at all? When you'd like to do it? Who would most likely manage it?
Hen
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
