Hi, This looks very good to me. Personally I'd prefer to see the client subprojects on slide top level as well. The advantage would be that we would achieve the same subproject structure for each slide subproject. This would enable us to use maven as build tool as it is done in Jakarta commons. If the client is split up again into subprojects this will be more complicated. My personal favourite would be to call the main directory webdav and to rename the server to slide... But this might be a too drastic change. Cheers + thanks for your great work, Daniel
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:slide-dev-return-15215-apmail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Stefan L�tzkendorf > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 19:02 > An: Slide Developers Mailing List > Betreff: Re: SVN migration > > We haven't discussed this yet. > > Currently we are preparing a release. If we have finished this, it might > be a good point. This will be at the start of the next year I think. > > I recently made some experiences with svn so I can offer to do this. > > Proposal for repository layout: > > /jakarta > /slide > /server > /branches > /tags > /trunk > /src (content of current jararta-slide/src) > /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs) > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib) > /client > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient) > /ant > /clientlib > /commandline > /connector > /etc > /lib > /wck > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck) > /conf > /src > /projector > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector) > /lib > /src > ... > /proposals (may be sandbox) > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals) > ... > /testsuite > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite) > /bin > ... > > This is a separate repository for each component that may be released > indepently. > > Its just a proposal (:-) > > Stefan > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > It seems to me that it would be good to get Slide over to Subversion > > before any moves to becoming a TLP. > > > > Have you guys thought about your SVN migration at all? When you'd like > > to do it? Who would most likely manage it? > > > > Hen > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
