On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 10:29 +0100, Stefan LÃtzkendorf wrote: > Do I understand you right with the adapted layout (see below). > > What todo with the lib directory currently in > jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib. We have to add it to each of the new > client directories?
We're going to need to rework the client build script as soon as the migration is finished. There's currently a single build script that all of the client components share. I think the quick way to solve this will be to have the clientlib build script build all of the client components (this is ugly). After we have something that at least works we should refactor the build script so each component is separate. Part of this refactoring will be copying dependency libs to the other components. So for now, just leave lib/ under clientlib/, I think. -James > > Stefan > > /jakarta > /slide > /server > /branches > /tags > /trunk > /src (content of current jararta-slide/src) > /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs) > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib) > > /clientlib > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/clientlib) > /src > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib) > /ant > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/ant) > /src > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib) > /commandline > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/commandline) > /src > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib) > /connector > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/connector) > /src > /conf (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/etc/conf) > /example > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient/lib) > > /wck > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck) > /conf > /src > /projector > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector) > /lib > /src > ... > /proposals (may be sandbox) > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals) > ... > /testsuite > /braches > /tags > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite) > /bin > ... > > > Daniel Florey wrote: > > > Hi, > > This looks very good to me. > > Personally I'd prefer to see the client subprojects on slide top level as > > well. The advantage would be that we would achieve the same subproject > > structure for each slide subproject. > > This would enable us to use maven as build tool as it is done in Jakarta > > commons. If the client is split up again into subprojects this will be more > > complicated. > > My personal favourite would be to call the main directory webdav and to > > rename the server to slide... > > But this might be a too drastic change. > > Cheers + thanks for your great work, > > Daniel > > > > > > > >>-----UrsprÃngliche Nachricht----- > >>Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>[mailto:slide-dev-return-15215-apmail- > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Stefan LÃtzkendorf > >>Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 19:02 > >>An: Slide Developers Mailing List > >>Betreff: Re: SVN migration > >> > >>We haven't discussed this yet. > >> > >>Currently we are preparing a release. If we have finished this, it might > >>be a good point. This will be at the start of the next year I think. > >> > >>I recently made some experiences with svn so I can offer to do this. > >> > >>Proposal for repository layout: > >> > >>/jakarta > >> /slide > >> /server > >> /branches > >> /tags > >> /trunk > >> /src (content of current jararta-slide/src) > >> /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs) > >> /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib) > >> /client > >> /braches > >> /tags > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient) > >> /ant > >> /clientlib > >> /commandline > >> /connector > >> /etc > >> /lib > >> /wck > >> /braches > >> /tags > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck) > >> /conf > >> /src > >> /projector > >> /braches > >> /tags > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector) > >> /lib > >> /src > >> ... > >> /proposals (may be sandbox) > >> /braches > >> /tags > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals) > >> ... > >> /testsuite > >> /braches > >> /tags > >> /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite) > >> /bin > >> ... > >> > >>This is a separate repository for each component that may be released > >>indepently. > >> > >>Its just a proposal (:-) > >> > >>Stefan > >> > >>Henri Yandell wrote: > >> > >>>It seems to me that it would be good to get Slide over to Subversion > >>>before any moves to becoming a TLP. > >>> > >>>Have you guys thought about your SVN migration at all? When you'd like > >>>to do it? Who would most likely manage it? > >>> > >>>Hen > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > >>-- > >>Stefan LÃtzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
