The only part I'm pushing for is that there is one directory inside jakarta/ and it is called slide. Just to make sure I get that in.
Underneath that, whatever :) Hen On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:42:45 +0100, Daniel Florey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > This looks very good to me. > Personally I'd prefer to see the client subprojects on slide top level as > well. The advantage would be that we would achieve the same subproject > structure for each slide subproject. > This would enable us to use maven as build tool as it is done in Jakarta > commons. If the client is split up again into subprojects this will be more > complicated. > My personal favourite would be to call the main directory webdav and to > rename the server to slide... > But this might be a too drastic change. > Cheers + thanks for your great work, > Daniel > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:slide-dev-return-15215-apmail- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Stefan L�tzkendorf > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 19:02 > > An: Slide Developers Mailing List > > Betreff: Re: SVN migration > > > > We haven't discussed this yet. > > > > Currently we are preparing a release. If we have finished this, it might > > be a good point. This will be at the start of the next year I think. > > > > I recently made some experiences with svn so I can offer to do this. > > > > Proposal for repository layout: > > > > /jakarta > > /slide > > /server > > /branches > > /tags > > /trunk > > /src (content of current jararta-slide/src) > > /docs (content of current jararta-slide/docs) > > /lib (content of current jararta-slide/lib) > > /client > > /braches > > /tags > > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/webdavclient) > > /ant > > /clientlib > > /commandline > > /connector > > /etc > > /lib > > /wck > > /braches > > /tags > > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/wck) > > /conf > > /src > > /projector > > /braches > > /tags > > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/projector) > > /lib > > /src > > ... > > /proposals (may be sandbox) > > /braches > > /tags > > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/proposals) > > ... > > /testsuite > > /braches > > /tags > > /trunk (content of current jararta-slide/testsuite) > > /bin > > ... > > > > This is a separate repository for each component that may be released > > indepently. > > > > Its just a proposal (:-) > > > > Stefan > > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > It seems to me that it would be good to get Slide over to Subversion > > > before any moves to becoming a TLP. > > > > > > Have you guys thought about your SVN migration at all? When you'd like > > > to do it? Who would most likely manage it? > > > > > > Hen > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > > Stefan L�tzkendorf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
