>Then I think CB needs to adopt the same stance as TAD - Say NO!.
That's what CBNSW or rather the putative CBNSW has done by default.
Since nobody is inclined to accept any more offers, we are saying not
YES! which is therefore !YES => NO!
>Or charge to take it away and thus earn the organisation $$$$.
Don't think of us could justify the loss of earnings to take time to do
this.
>If CB has decided that organisations are the preferred way to go, then
>that is fine.
Nobody has decided anything, there is no CBNSW to decide anything, it
just happens to be the current evidence that equipment, albeit old, is
trivial to get. But please keep those ideas coming.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://slug.org.au/lists/listinfo/slug
