debian is nice i dont mnd it, but redhat hmm i wont go there.

I started on redhat and was stuck with it for quite some time (it wasn't sensitive 
about my ram, but i didn't know there was a prob) after i the problem i jumped to 
slackware and haen't looked back, its got a superior fs layout to when i last ed rdhat.

But I suppose it all depends on what you plan to do, if your a newbie and want a 
desktop i think mandrake is the way to go, if you want a server steer clear of redhat 
and mandrake thats my opinion anyway. feel free to present yours.


-- 
Karl Clements
"Everyone is stupid, its just the degree that varies"

<reply who="Stephan Borg" date="Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:38:51 +1100">

> To play the Devil's advocate - I am a Redhat and Debian user. One of the
> main points I see being raised in this thread, is learning the internals
> of Linux.
> 
> I started out on RH4, and in those days, you still needed to know some
> internals. But using RPMs and a little mucking about, I installed a base
> system (non-bloated, which I might add is how I do all my installs) and
> then added RPMs as necessary. If I need to know whats in the package, I
> use rpm to tell me where it went and what it modified.
> 
> My point to this email - one advantage I've found, is that when I work
> on clients systems, the majority use RH or Debian, I still know my
> internals as well as these distro's. IMHO - the cake and eating it too.
> 
> Hiding behind my sandbags, in preparation for the flames,
> 
> Stephan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Karl Clements
> Sent: Saturday, 5 January 2002 10:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SLUG] Slackware anybody?
> 
> 
> I have been using slackware on my gateway/firewall machne for the better
> part of a  yer i think, it originated as rh5 then slack 4 now slack8,
> its good it stays up for days/weeks/months on end (subject to power
> outages). I had no problem getting it going at all on my gateway
> 
> I also use slack8 on my workstation, i didn't want to have a bloated
> install so i installed mostly the base packages then downloaded and
> compiled them, there are advantages to downloading and compiling over a
> packagemanagment tool 
> a) you know where it will end up
> b) you can optimise it for your system
> c) you configure it with options you want
> 
> I did have some trouble getting X going on my workstation but that was
> primarily because my video card and monitor suck, but after spending
> 20-30mins reading the XF86Config man file i was able to write my own
> config that worked.
> 
> I think slack is a good distro because it doesn't have the bloat of
> others, and it is very easy to install.
> 
> As for your questions,video is a kernel thing, slack8 does have isdn
> packages (plus the kernel aspect) it comes with kde2.1.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karl Clements
> "Everyone is stupid, its just the degree that varies"
>  
> <reply who="gnudev" date="Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:16:50 +1000">
> 
> > I am looking at taking up Slackware. After being a RedHat devotee 
> > until they
> > decided to frequently release bloatware, and the risky GCC 2.96, I
> started 
> > looking at Debian. Now I am looking more closely at Slackware 8.0 and
> I think 
> > this is the Linux for me.
> > 
> > I would like to know some things about Slack, like if it has a package
> > manager, can I adjust my video text mode (I like 100x40), can I use an
> ISDN 
> > connection with it, is it stable with the 2.4 kernel option, will the 
> > installer ask me if I want XFree 4.1 (even in newbie install mode? I
> can't 
> > remember if I saw there was a 'newbie' installation mode), does it
> come with 
> > the drivers for the GeForce II MX cards (or can I compile them after
> taking 
> > them down from nVidia's site), is the KDE distro on it complete like
> that 
> > with RedHat, and generally, are there any major high points of Slack
> over 
> > others?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > James
> > --
> > SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> > More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More
> Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
> 
> -- 
> SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
> More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Reply via email to