nop. This is only one point of view. Many people including myself strongly disagree with it. For more details see wiki link, posted by Eugene in the very first reply: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU/Linux_naming_controversy
So, would you rather agree with Linus, Linux creator? Arguments for "Linux": Linus Torvalds has said in the documentary Revolution OS, when asked if the name GNU/Linux was justified: Well, I think it's justified, but it's justified if you actually make a GNU distribution of Linux ... the same way that I think that "Red Hat Linux" is fine, or "SuSE Linux" or "Debian Linux," because if you actually make your own distribution of Linux, you get to name the thing, but calling Linux in general "GNU Linux" I think is just ridiculous.[23] Finally I found this quote. That's exactly my point. "Ridiculous" is the right word. Regards, Anton On 20/06/07, John Thng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello people, I think all should read these articles below also, before commenting further. http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-users-never-heard-of-gnu.html http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html A lot of questions are asked and answered in the first link. Regards John
_______________________________________________ Slugnet mailing list [email protected] http://www.lugs.org.sg/mailman/listinfo/slugnet
