RE: [smartBridges] Preamble, and my $3000.00 mistake

[Lanham Rattan]

Title: Message

I realized that after I sent the message :)  I would still like to know the number of clients others are supporting. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jason Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Preamble, and my $3000.00 mistake He didn�t say that. He said he has 100 clients. They might be on more than one AP.   That law schooling finally paid off J   Jason   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lanham Rattan Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Preamble, and my $3000.00 mistake   You have 100 clients on one AP? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of phantam Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:19 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [smartBridges] Preamble, and my $3000.00 mistake Ok what kind of performance difference are we talking of Short over Long I mean im not going to go changing 100 clients if I'm only gonna get an added 50kbit of throughput but if it improves the connection strength (Doesn't disassociate as easily) I will definitely do it. As a note yes the CPE's have a setting for preamble they MUST be the SAME as the AP or it just will not work.   As a note alex never said it was suggested to change in fact I noticed alex never really tells us exactly what to do he suggests trying certain solutions. The preamble change was suggested when someone asked what it was and he said that short preamble had better throughput but longer time to associate.   Chris