Could it be hidden node issues?

Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: "Blazen Wireless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 12:10:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Slow down problems

> well after replacing the D-LINK switch up at the tower it made no real
> difference on the amount of single deffered packets that the APPO is
> seeing. Is there any other ideas what could cause this if not the
> switch? I put in a  10 base t hub which should force everything at 10
> 1/2 duplex I did not try the big old Cisco as it was just to much of a
> pin to lug up here and add another huge Nema box for it..
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Blazen Wireless 
>   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>   Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:01 PM
>   Subject: Slow down problems 
> 
> 
>   Okay I think I have figured out the problem with my system. It seems
> that when users are one (close users) they are associated to the APPO
> at 5.5 to 11 megs possibly and the users that are further away are at 1
> meg max well if you have the near users at 11 megs tying up the radio
> and the far uses cant connect at a slower speed for a better link /
> speed quality then the far users suffer? am I correct in my theory does
> that make any sense?
> 
>   So going forward we are going to have to plan some more sites closer
> to the users having issues etc Has anyone else experienced this. I cant
> verify 100% that this is true due to the fact the radios don't report
> what speed they are associated at? Can someone think of a way to
> validate this theory??
> 
>   Thanks
> 
>   Martin & Steve
>   Blazen Wireless
>   www.blazenwireless.com

----------ANNOUNCEMENT----------
Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV
http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm

The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List
To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges 
<yournickname>
To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges)
Archives: http://archives.part-15.org  

Reply via email to