Looks good.

Antonello Cruz wrote:
> Tom Whitten wrote:
>> Just one nit in reference to
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~acruz/6855845-diff-2-3/.
>>
>> usr/src/cmd/svc/svccfg/svccfg_libscf.c:
>>     line 7557:    The return value, r, seems to be ignored.  If that
>>             is intentional, then I'd recommend casting the
>>             function call to void as you do in line 7550.
> Good catch! Thanks!
> Incremental webrev at
>     http://cr.opensolaris.org/~acruz/6855845-diff-3-4/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Antonello
>
> _______________________________________________
> smf-discuss mailing list
> smf-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
>

-- 
Sean Wilcox
303.272.9711
x79711


Reply via email to