> 3. wladm_ioctl_set() and wladm_ioctl_get() > > I don't think it is right to introduce these two generic libwladm APIs (Do > they PSARCed?) I think it makes more sense to have library functions like: > > wladm_set_wpa(), wladm_del_key() etc.
Seconded. I really do not like the idea of introducing a low-level ioctl interface into libwladm. -- meem
