> Richard L. Hamilton writes:
> > > I'd still prefer to see a plain uint64_t with a
> > > rounded-up size.
> > 
> > I'm curious - why?
> 
> Because it's simple, and it doesn't look to me like
> this is a
> situation that calls for heroic measures.

Thanks, I hadn't thought of the simplicity angle too.
I can see that there might a balance between
between simplicity (obviousness) and
strict correctness of all of alignment, exact size, and
data type (i.e. a buffer of  unsigned bytes).  I guess
I could argue either side of that when it came to maintainability.
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to