Correct, snapd doesn't provide any license information currently and GNOME Software defaults to interpreting this as propietary.
The bug tracking this is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555567 On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM Sergio Schvezov < [email protected]> wrote: > El sábado, 17 de septiembre de 2016 17h'58:29 ART, Mark Shuttleworth > <[email protected]> escribió: > > On 17/09/16 08:56, Spencer wrote: > >> I see. Well, I'm not sure what the answer should be, but I can tell > >> you that it being "non-free" is a significant deterrent against anyone > >> downloading and installing this or anyone's snap, or so I would think. > > > > Agreed - I think this is just a flag in the database, and I'm pretty > > sure there is a way to change that, just not sure where it is. But this > > is the right list to ask on :) > > The license feature needs to be brought back into snapd. If there is no > license The Software Center defaults to proprietary. > > I know seb128 or rancell were on top of this at one point and logged a bug > against snapd. > > > > -- > Enviado con Dekko desde mi dispositivo Ubuntu > > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft >
-- Snapcraft mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
