Its odd because the number of messags snf is processing isn't more than usual and the % of spam being detected through snf is actually lower than typical yet is is routinely maxing out 4 processors at 100%.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Pete McNeil <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2013-03-27 14:38, Darin Cox wrote: > >> Probably unrelated... and due to a significant increase in spam over the >> past few days. >> > > I agree with that -- our inbound spamtrap pre-processor has seen 4x > increase over the past few days so that's likely to be related. > > Also, Richard, I took a quick look at your telemetry and verified that > your rulebase file(s) are up to date. > > Best, > > > _M > > -- > Pete McNeil > Chief Scientist > ARM Research Labs, LLC > www.armresearch.com > 866-770-1044 x7010 > twitter/codedweller > > > ##############################**##############################**# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <[email protected]>. > This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, > Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. > For More information see http://www.armresearch.com > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > <sniffer-digest@sortmonster.**com<[email protected]> > > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]**> > Send administrative queries to > <sniffer-request@sortmonster.**com<[email protected]> > > > >
