It would be SNF routinely showing 80% utilization spikes for a 4 cpu
system. I hadn't ever seen it do that before which was why I sent the
message.  Don't believe the load is any higher than normal.  The spikes
aren't as prolonged at the present.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Pete McNeil
<madscient...@armresearch.com>wrote:

> On 2013-03-27 16:49, Richard Stupek wrote:
>
>> Its odd because the number of messags snf is processing isn't more than
>> usual and the % of spam being detected through snf is actually lower than
>> typical yet is is routinely maxing out 4 processors at 100%.
>>
>
> You're saying that SNF is maxing out 4 processors? ... or is the
> combination of operations on your server maxing out 4 processors?
>
> We're using the same engine and ruelbase in our CGP server and humming
> along nicely at between 2000 - 8000 msg/minute with nominal CPU loads.
>
> I don't see anything unusual in your telemetry and I haven't heard any
> other complaints, so I can't explain why SNF would act differently on your
> system. I hate a mystery though -- so I would love to get to the bottom of
> it.
>
> Do you see anything else that might be causing the CPU load?
>
>
> _M
>
> --
> Pete McNeil
> Chief Scientist
> ARM Research Labs, LLC
> www.armresearch.com
> 866-770-1044 x7010
> twitter/codedweller
>
>
> ##############################**##############################**#
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>  the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>.
> This list is for discussing Message Sniffer,
> Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics.
> For More information see http://www.armresearch.com
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com>
> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
> <sniffer-digest@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com>
> >
> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com**>
> Send administrative queries to  
> <sniffer-request@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to