It would be SNF routinely showing 80% utilization spikes for a 4 cpu system. I hadn't ever seen it do that before which was why I sent the message. Don't believe the load is any higher than normal. The spikes aren't as prolonged at the present.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Pete McNeil <madscient...@armresearch.com>wrote: > On 2013-03-27 16:49, Richard Stupek wrote: > >> Its odd because the number of messags snf is processing isn't more than >> usual and the % of spam being detected through snf is actually lower than >> typical yet is is routinely maxing out 4 processors at 100%. >> > > You're saying that SNF is maxing out 4 processors? ... or is the > combination of operations on your server maxing out 4 processors? > > We're using the same engine and ruelbase in our CGP server and humming > along nicely at between 2000 - 8000 msg/minute with nominal CPU loads. > > I don't see anything unusual in your telemetry and I haven't heard any > other complaints, so I can't explain why SNF would act differently on your > system. I hate a mystery though -- so I would love to get to the bottom of > it. > > Do you see anything else that might be causing the CPU load? > > > _M > > -- > Pete McNeil > Chief Scientist > ARM Research Labs, LLC > www.armresearch.com > 866-770-1044 x7010 > twitter/codedweller > > > ##############################**##############################**# > This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. > This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, > Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. > For More information see http://www.armresearch.com > To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com> > To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > <sniffer-digest@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com> > > > To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com**> > Send administrative queries to > <sniffer-request@sortmonster.**com<sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com> > > > >