On 2013-03-27 16:49, Richard Stupek wrote:
Its odd because the number of messags snf is processing isn't more than usual and the % of spam being detected through snf is actually lower than typical yet is is routinely maxing out 4 processors at 100%.
You're saying that SNF is maxing out 4 processors? ... or is the combination of operations on your server maxing out 4 processors?
We're using the same engine and ruelbase in our CGP server and humming along nicely at between 2000 - 8000 msg/minute with nominal CPU loads.
I don't see anything unusual in your telemetry and I haven't heard any other complaints, so I can't explain why SNF would act differently on your system. I hate a mystery though -- so I would love to get to the bottom of it.
Do you see anything else that might be causing the CPU load? _M -- Pete McNeil Chief Scientist ARM Research Labs, LLC www.armresearch.com 866-770-1044 x7010 twitter/codedweller ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <sniffer@sortmonster.com>. This list is for discussing Message Sniffer, Anti-spam, Anti-Malware, and related email topics. For More information see http://www.armresearch.com To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <sniffer-...@sortmonster.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <sniffer-dig...@sortmonster.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <sniffer-in...@sortmonster.com> Send administrative queries to <sniffer-requ...@sortmonster.com>
