Frank, I think it is important to clarify: Which flavor of ethernet did you get to work at over 400 ft.? 10baseT, 100baseT, 1000baseT?
I assume it was using ethernet switch technology, not repeater hubs, correct? Tim McGrath ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Keeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 8:48 AM Subject: [SOCALWUG] Re: Wired Ethernet limits > > I've run Ethernet just beyond 400' and it worked fine. > > There are many fiber devices that should do the job perfectly. > > > Frank Keeney > Blog: http://www.unwiredadventures.com > Work: http://www.wlanparts.com > Photos: http://snurl.com/unwirephotos > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Victor Caballero > > > > > > I know this is a wireless group, but I'll try anyway. > > > > We have 3 separate buildings that are 400-500' each at least > > apart from the > > each other. > > > > Anyone have suggestions? What type of wired repeaters work best or > > long-haul devices. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SOCALWUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SOCALWUG SOCALWUG website: http://www.socalwug.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
