Jonathon Blake wrote:
Bruce wrote:
And for Christian, I'll point out that using OOo in South Africa
violates the Legal Code there. Yet Sun has point blank refused to make
the changes that are required to makes its usage legal.
[At least the relevant passage was moved from the "subversive acts of
terrorism", which is where it was originally placed, allegedly, by
accident.]
Can you explain this point in more detail?
Which part?
i) The fact that it was "a subsversive act of terrorism".
ii) That its usage is not legal?
xan
jonathon
How about all of the above?
--
Bruce Byfield 604-421-7177
http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield
