Hallo Alberto,
yes would be nice to have separat agc-times for attack and decay.
Sometimes it seems to be better, to be able to fix the value.
Changing of these factors should be working for purpose of AM, SSB,
CW-decoding.
There is a dependence for the result of receiving. Even the third
factor hanging time would be nice.
The usage of SDRadio is more or less a basical utility to experiment
with computer related receivers. To be able to show the actual values
and to change them, gives the opportunity, to demonstrate features of
SDRs and to demonstrate design factors for the interested viewers.
I use software even for demonstration of classical factors in only
hardware receiver. It is sometimes astonishing given values of
hardware receivers to demonstrate against sdr-receivers. As one
example to show the new features of the new technique.
>From my point of view:
o attack-time
o decay-time
o maybe hanging time (for me it seems for me a special very
short decay time)
Your software is a very nice tool, to work with new receiver-types. I
use it for I/Q and classical concepts.
I think, that SDRadio should have a specialization for receiving of
general receivers. I know Winrad too, ist is a more specific tool.
Thank You
Wolfgang 49N28, 11E00
--- In [email protected], "i2phd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Wolfgang Hartmann"
> <dadalbinder@> wrote:
> >
> > Hallo Alberto,
> >
> > if You plan to update SDRadio, it would be verny nice, to have
> > implemented the ability to change the AGC for attack and delay.
> >
> > I use the programm a lot with several receivers especially at the
> > moment with I/Q-concepts and hearing longer times on stations
> > sending informations or music. Maybee there is an automatic
changing
> > by the programm depending from decoding modus AM, LSB, USB. I
would
> > be happy to be able to fix it by myself.
> >
> > Wolfgang Hartmann, 49N28 11E00
>
> Hello Wolfgang,
>
> could you please be more specific about the changes that you would
> like to see on the AGC ? I suppose you want it faster in AM and
slower
> in SSB. Is this true ? Thanks.
>
> 73 Alberto I2PHD
>
