--- In [email protected], "mikecol2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a EMU1212M and it has excellent response at 192K sampling. > It is very flat almost to 90+Khz. One problem though is that at > 192Ksps requires at 4 sample delay between I and Q channels ( 2 > samples at 96Ksps ). Many software programs do not support this much > delay. > > Output is also very flat. Works great +-80Khz at 192Ksps with no > problem.
Mike, that is a valuable information, many thanks. As a matter of fact, I have recently bought on eBay a used 1212M, and in my small black book with the to-do list, there is also the support of that card from Winrad, both with the MME and the ASIO drivers. I am already aware of a problem with the ASIO drivers, namely the channels are not enumerated consecutively. Usually the ASIO ch.1 is the left channel, ch.2 is the right. Not so with that card. But when you know it, it is easy to circumvent it in software. Now you gave me an additional information about the 2 and 4 samples delay. Have you measured that using the MME or the ASIO drivers ? I am tempted to guess that the problem manifests only with the MME drivers, ASIO should be immune, but, as said, mine is just a guess... 73 Alberto I2PHD
