> > Another better card, albeit more expensive, is the EMU-1212M (pay > attention to the final M. It exists also a version > > without the M, with reduced dynamic range).
> When sampling at 192K: how is the 20-96kHz frequency response? > > Jean-Claude PJ2BVU > I have a EMU1212M and it has excellent response at 192K sampling. It is very flat almost to 90+Khz. One problem though is that at 192Ksps requires at 4 sample delay between I and Q channels ( 2 samples at 96Ksps ). Many software programs do not support this much delay. Output is also very flat. Works great +-80Khz at 192Ksps with no problem. To see more details you can check the files section on the softrock40 group under my callsign KF4BQ. I did some comparison testing of the EMU-1212M, EMU-0202 and Edirol FA-66. The EMU-1212M comes out on top by a big margin. Mike Collins KF4BQ
