Yeah it's no big deal to me but technically it is a bug. I didn't even know about it until Szabolcs asked someone to double check it.
Dragging a slider to one spot, having the dialog not clamp the UI value as specified in SPDL, and not having the actual operator results match the SPDL slider or UI value are a little concerning since that seems like it would be a more general UI bug that goes beyond this one control. Do I now have to wonder if using the slider of any PPG will not be tracked correctly? I don't know. Curious bug though. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Caron Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SI2013SP1 i dont see that as an issue, they are blocking really low values which might result in the split to actually be right on top of the boundary edge. if you want a really really close edge use the "]" key (split edge tool) middle click and drag for a loop and left click and drag for a single point s On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Eric Cosky <[email protected]> wrote: This is what I get, http://imgur.com/60YJx The point isn't able to get to the corner and there is the unexpected error in the log. CreatePrim "Cube", "MeshSurface" ActivateEdgeSelTool ActivateEdgeSelTool SelectGeometryComponents "cube.edge[10]" SplitEdge "cube.edge[10]", 50, False, True, siPersistentOperation ' ERROR : 2006-EDIT-SetValue - Unexpected failure. SetValue "cube.polymsh.splitedgeop.ratioedge", 0.001 Trying to execute the SetValue command manually gives an overflow error. SetValue "cube.polymsh.splitedgeop.ratioedge", 0.001 ' ERROR : Overflow: 'SetValue' - [line 1] Setting to 0.0010000001 doesn't cause the error though, so it's not a parser error skipping the last digit.. odd. I found that modifying C3DSplitEdgeOp.spdl so the ratioedgerange was clamped to 0.002 avoided the problem (0.0011 and smaller numbers didn't work for me, didn't try to converge on the smallest usable value - the ui only shows 3 digits so 0.002 might be the limit). Parameter "ratioedge" { GUID = {CF8F1A90-46B9-11d4-8C28-009027BC3A0E}; Name = "Ratio Edge "; Description = "Ratio on edge where to split the edge"; Type = VT_R8; Caps = Persistable, Animatable; Class = E3DPROPERTY_CLASS_TOPO; Range = 0.002 to 99.999; UIRange = 0.002 to 99.999; } Oddly I found if moving the mouse quickly, it would still show 0.001 with the new clamping and the actual point location was nowhere near 0.001 - pic here: http://imgur.com/EGahh So, yeah, it's a little buggy. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Szabolcs Matefy Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: SI2013SP1 Unfortunately not repaired. Could you check please: 1. Make a cube 2. Use the split edge with ratio control, and try to slide the slider to the left extreme, see the result on the viewport. I hope it's just a local issue, and not worldwide. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Szabolcs Matefy Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: SI2013SP1 Never mind I found it. I hope, that the split edge ratio PPG is repaired. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Szabolcs Matefy Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: SI2013SP1 Hey And where is this update? I can't see on subscription. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Cosky Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:23 AM To: [email protected] Subject: SI2013SP1 Just installed SP1, no problems so far and it's nice to see a few pet bugs have been fixed. Thanks for the update. -Eric Cosky
