ok i see, the ui needs to protect better the inputs to the operator. the op doesn't support that value (not that it couldn't).
@szabolcs, have you logged this? On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Eric Cosky <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah it’s no big deal to me but technically it is a bug. I didn’t even > know about it until Szabolcs asked someone to double check it.**** > > ** ** > > Dragging a slider to one spot, having the dialog not clamp the UI value as > specified in SPDL, and not having the actual operator results match the > SPDL slider or UI value are a little concerning since that seems like it > would be a more general UI bug that goes beyond this one control. Do I now > have to wonder if using the slider of any PPG will not be tracked > correctly? I don’t know. Curious bug though. **** > > **** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Steven Caron > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 10:55 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: SI2013SP1**** > > ** ** > > i dont see that as an issue, they are blocking really low values which > might result in the split to actually be right on top of the boundary edge. > if you want a really really close edge use the "]" key (split edge tool) > middle click and drag for a loop and left click and drag for a single point > **** > > ** ** > > s**** > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Eric Cosky <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > This is what I get, http://imgur.com/60YJx **** > > The point isn’t able to get to the corner and there is the unexpected > error in the log.**** > > **** > > **** > > CreatePrim "Cube", "MeshSurface"**** > > ActivateEdgeSelTool**** > > ActivateEdgeSelTool**** > > SelectGeometryComponents "cube.edge[10]"**** > > SplitEdge "cube.edge[10]", 50, False, True, siPersistentOperation**** > > ' ERROR : 2006-EDIT-SetValue - Unexpected failure.**** > > SetValue "cube.polymsh.splitedgeop.ratioedge", 0.001**** > > **** > > **** > > Trying to execute the SetValue command manually gives an overflow error. * > *** > > SetValue "cube.polymsh.splitedgeop.ratioedge", 0.001**** > > ' ERROR : Overflow: 'SetValue' - [line 1]**** > > **** > > Setting to 0.0010000001 doesn’t cause the error though, so it’s not a > parser error skipping the last digit.. odd. **** > > **** > > I found that modifying C3DSplitEdgeOp.spdl so the ratioedgerange was > clamped to 0.002 avoided the problem (0.0011 and smaller numbers didn’t > work for me, didn’t try to converge on the smallest usable value – the ui > only shows 3 digits so 0.002 might be the limit). **** > > **** > > **** > > Parameter "ratioedge"**** > > {**** > > GUID = > {CF8F1A90-46B9-11d4-8C28-009027BC3A0E};**** > > Name = "Ratio Edge ";**** > > Description = "Ratio on edge where to > split the edge";**** > > Type = VT_R8;**** > > Caps = Persistable, Animatable;**** > > Class = E3DPROPERTY_CLASS_TOPO;**** > > Range = 0.002 to 99.999;**** > > UIRange = 0.002 to 99.999;**** > > }**** > > **** > > **** > > Oddly I found if moving the mouse quickly, it would still show 0.001 with > the new clamping and the actual point location was nowhere near 0.001 – pic > here: http://imgur.com/EGahh**** > > **** > > So, yeah, it’s a little buggy.**** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Szabolcs Matefy > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 12:46 AM**** > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: SI2013SP1**** > > **** > > Unfortunately not repaired. Could you check please:**** > > **** > > 1. Make a cube**** > > 2. Use the split edge with ratio control, and try to slide the > slider to the left extreme, see the result on the viewport. I hope it’s > just a local issue, and not worldwide…**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [ > mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > *On Behalf Of *Szabolcs Matefy > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:15 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: SI2013SP1**** > > **** > > Never mind I found it. I hope, that the split edge ratio PPG is repaired.* > *** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Szabolcs > Matefy > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:58 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: SI2013SP1**** > > **** > > Hey**** > > **** > > And where is this update? I can’t see on subscription…**** > > **** > > *From:* [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Eric Cosky > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:23 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* SI2013SP1**** > > **** > > Just installed SP1, no problems so far and it’s nice to see a few pet bugs > have been fixed. **** > > **** > > Thanks for the update.**** > > **** > > -Eric Cosky**** > > **** > > ** ** >
