i agree with ahmidou.

I avoid SCOPS like the plague, usually i can do it with pure ICE.

if for some reason it cant be done with ICE then I insist that people here
use jscript. Otherwise your animators are paying a big price speed wise.

Truthfully though, since ICE came out, i've been able to avoid using SCOPS
100%. I consider it obsolete tech now.







On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Peter Agg <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see it more as a trade off of speed with quality of life. :)
>
>
> On 7 February 2013 12:39, Ahmidou.xsi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'd never use python for SCOPs, it's way slower than jscript.
>>
>> Le 7 févr. 2013 à 20:47, Peter Agg <[email protected]> a écrit :
>>
>> I tend to use ICE as a sort of SCOP testbed, especially if the maths is a
>> little complicated it's easier to dev the system there and re-write into
>> Python later. The only exception would be if I needed to make use of
>> locations/geometry queries. But then it's still easier to store a custom
>> attribute then read that into a script.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7 February 2013 02:02, Raffaele Fragapane <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I mean output to an ICE par, not to a CP par, which is akin to hitting
>>> your testicles with a large mallet.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, joshxsi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FYI, outputting to a parameter to ICE is around 10x slower than
>>>> outputting to a transform, so I highly recommend that if performance is a
>>>> requirement, never output from ICE into a parameter.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> -j
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Raffaele Fragapane <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You might be better off decoupling the length computation, which tends
>>>>> to be expensive with any high order surface or curve, and output it to a
>>>>> parameter you fetch from graphs further down the stream.
>>>>> That way you should save a fair chunk of cycles.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you need to keep them aligned you could also use some tricks to
>>>>> basically reduce the dirtyness to a simpler check, like comparing point
>>>>> positions before you start integrating your length function.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Our users will know fear and cower before our software! Ship it! Ship it
>>> and let them flee like the dogs they are!
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to