let's be honest.. NOTHING so far can replace Softimage and it's workflow.... it is not only tools and parts in it it is workflow as a whole so... even if they put in maya everything SI have it still won't be SI so...
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < [email protected]> wrote: > I don’t think Houdini could replace a software like Softimage, parts of it > surely can but not all of it.**** > > ** ** > > Modo might be more of a contender. Modo 701 is interesting albeit not the > revolution we are expecting from the new merge of Modo and The Foundry. ** > ** > > Modo is pretty powerful for its young age. It has some rough spots but it > will come.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rob Chapman > *Sent:* 15 mars 2013 09:56 > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: 2014 New feature list... minor corrections list... you > decide**** > > ** ** > > but is really hard to use if one is of simple mind (like myself) and so > used to Softimage workflow, nodes are executed when not even connected, > just floating! I really cannot handle POP CHOP SOP VOX POP HOT WOT? > terminology as well as you breathe too heavily nearby then you have 17 gb > of datas that you did not ask for.**** > > ** ** > > grass is not always greener etc. **** > > ** ** > > :)**** > > On 15 March 2013 14:45, Ciaran Moloney <[email protected]> wrote:** > ** > > I don't think it's all sweetness and light in Houdini land. It's a > bug-fest just like all of these other software. And just like everybody > else, users get cranky about bugs or features that have been on the list > for years. Clearly there's way more positivity to every release than most > every other DCC, reflecting that development has its priorities straight. > So yeah, they definitely have less gripes - they get daily builds FFS! (and > to be fair they pay for it...)**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Ciaran**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Adam Seeley <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Hi, > > Just wondering for those people who have a foot each in the AD camp & the > Houdini camp..... are the Houdini crowd a bunch of happy campers or do they > have the same amount of gripes? > > Adam**** > > ** ** > > **** > > ----------------------**** > > Freelance Softimage Generalist**** > > http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=21162305**** > > https://vimeo.com/album/2280465 > > **** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Emilio Hernandez <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Thursday, 14 March 2013, 18:24**** > > > *Subject:* Re: 2014 New feature list... minor corrections list... you > decide**** > > ** ** > > Well that sure is something people using Houdini appreciate and we using > AD products regret. Perhaps updates are so Top Secret that AD doesn't > want other software companies to see what's coming up... More of the > same. In the meantime we can only hope that NEW IMPROVEMENTS to Softimage > are coming. Something like now you can have in Maya the Softimage color > scheme and vs., ...**** > > But for some small things actually the way Softimage is now with the > participation of Exocortex, Eric Mootz, and the other addons that are > coming out, I think that there is not too much to improve...**** > > ** ** > > 2013/3/14 Mário Domingos <[email protected]>**** > > This is an example of a proper software update. **** > > ** ** > > > http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2447&Itemid=360 > **** > > Mário Domingos**** > > ** ** > > www.mariodomingos.com**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > Sent from my super iPhone**** > > ** ** > > > On 14/03/2013, at 17:10, Doeke Wartena <[email protected]> wrote:**** > > I would like if you can see the size of objects so it's easier to make > models for 3d printing.**** > > ** ** > > 2013/3/14 Francois Lord <[email protected]>**** > > +1**** > > > > On 14/03/2013 09:45, Eric Lampi wrote:**** > > Guys, > > Don't you think it's better to just wait for the list to be released > before getting too worked up over it?**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > > > > -- > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** >
